Alright I'm almost done with school. Got an incredibly 1 page out of 10 done for my paper on the Supreme Court's stance on 'virtual child' pornography due Thursday (no. I didn't come up with the topic myself). But, I'm coming down to the wire, and I will soon be able to rip my head out of my asshole, take a shower, and get back to splooging nonsensical words onto this otherwise unpopular blog. In even better news, I have a full-time job in Boston so you know what that means right? Of course you don't. I'll have more opportunities to write blogs on the train. That means a new blog post almost every day starting Jan. 3rd! Get excited children!
Anyway, after reading several documents on 'virtual child' pornography (basically advanced CGI pictures or young-looking adults according to the court), I'm am still very fuckin' confused on whether this shit is illegal or not. Is it illegal under federal laws but not in the court? I don't fuckin' know. Damn judicial system and its confusing, unnecessary choice of words. Why can't they just blatantly say whether it's illegal? Anyway, I chose this topic out of a list the professor gave us. I thought it would be the easiest to argue. I now feel very creepy and regret my decision wholly. Anyway, I'm not gone. I'll be back with a vengeance or something cliche and gay.
And, like always when my blogs contain not actual content. Here's a funny video: